<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: N.Y. Post: The Voters Should Decide</title>
	<link>http://www.ryansager.com/blog/index.php/2008/02/12/ny-post-the-voters-should-decide/</link>
	<description>What's your M.O.?</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 12:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: mw</title>
		<link>http://www.ryansager.com/blog/index.php/2008/02/12/ny-post-the-voters-should-decide/#comment-4365</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ryansager.com/blog/index.php/2008/02/12/ny-post-the-voters-should-decide/#comment-4365</guid>
					<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;"As a libertarian committed to the defeat of John McCain, I’ll be pissed if we’re left with Hillary Clinton as our last, best hope."&lt;/i&gt; - rs&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ryan,
How do you reconcile this position, as a libertarian who has also, &lt;a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/blog/2006/05/divided_we_stand.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;in the past&lt;/a&gt;, acknowledged the value of divided government to limit the growth of the state?

The choice it 2008, is not Obama or Clinton vs. McCain. It is:

&lt;b&gt;Obama (or Clinton)   Pelosi   Reid
-vs-
McCain   Pelosi   Reid&lt;/b&gt;

I am also &lt;a href="http://westanddivided.blogspot.com/2008/02/gop-deathwatch-tracking-kbler-ross.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;not happy&lt;/a&gt; about McCain being the "&lt;i&gt;last best choice&lt;/i&gt;" against a unified single party Democratic government with expanded majorities in both houses of congress and a real possibility of a filibuster proof 60 vote plurality in the Senate. Tell me why that is not worse than a McCain presidency?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><i>&#8220;As a libertarian committed to the defeat of John McCain, I’ll be pissed if we’re left with Hillary Clinton as our last, best hope.&#8221;</i> - rs</p></blockquote>
<p>Ryan,<br />
How do you reconcile this position, as a libertarian who has also, <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/blog/2006/05/divided_we_stand.html" rel="nofollow">in the past</a>, acknowledged the value of divided government to limit the growth of the state?</p>
<p>The choice it 2008, is not Obama or Clinton vs. McCain. It is:</p>
<p><b>Obama (or Clinton)   Pelosi   Reid<br />
-vs-<br />
McCain   Pelosi   Reid</b></p>
<p>I am also <a href="http://westanddivided.blogspot.com/2008/02/gop-deathwatch-tracking-kbler-ross.html" rel="nofollow">not happy</a> about McCain being the &#8220;<i>last best choice</i>&#8221; against a unified single party Democratic government with expanded majorities in both houses of congress and a real possibility of a filibuster proof 60 vote plurality in the Senate. Tell me why that is not worse than a McCain presidency?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

