<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Religious Right Watch, Part I</title>
	<link>http://www.ryansager.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/20/religious-right-watch-part-i/</link>
	<description>What's your M.O.?</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 16:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Karol</title>
		<link>http://www.ryansager.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/20/religious-right-watch-part-i/#comment-773</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 18:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ryansager.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/20/religious-right-watch-part-i/#comment-773</guid>
					<description>Yeah, I agree with Rich.  Why shouldn't the parents know what the kids are doing?  Isn't that actually a better way to gain acceptance for homosexuality?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I agree with Rich.  Why shouldn&#8217;t the parents know what the kids are doing?  Isn&#8217;t that actually a better way to gain acceptance for homosexuality?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rich Minnich</title>
		<link>http://www.ryansager.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/20/religious-right-watch-part-i/#comment-772</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 08:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ryansager.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/20/religious-right-watch-part-i/#comment-772</guid>
					<description>I had to laugh a bit at this comment - expecting to have a say over your own children (you know - minors, those people under 18 who are still under parental control.)  Your comment tries to extrapolate this into something much different than what (according to your posting) they are asking.  Also, one hardly needs to be "religious right" or "religious" or even "right" to expect to extend parental control.  I understand that Hillary Clinton, despite her liberal recommendations for other peoples children, kept Chelsea on a tight chain.
Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had to laugh a bit at this comment - expecting to have a say over your own children (you know - minors, those people under 18 who are still under parental control.)  Your comment tries to extrapolate this into something much different than what (according to your posting) they are asking.  Also, one hardly needs to be &#8220;religious right&#8221; or &#8220;religious&#8221; or even &#8220;right&#8221; to expect to extend parental control.  I understand that Hillary Clinton, despite her liberal recommendations for other peoples children, kept Chelsea on a tight chain.<br />
Thanks
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

