Michael Kinsley wonders why The New York Times thinks journalists should get more First Amendment rights than other citizens.

Snip:

The Times believes that its First Amendment right to speak includes a right (for journalists only) not to speak when subpoenaed in a criminal investigation. Meanwhile, it cannot see how a right to speak includes the right to spend money on speech.

Hmmm… Liberals catching on to the faulty logic of campaign-finance reform.

I love it.