So, really, I have no problem with the reporter who planted a question for Rumsfeld with a willing soldier.

But here’s a question: If the e-mail that’s been circulating from the reporter in question is authentic, then why doesn’t the Times reporter mentioned in the e-mail (who seems to have known that the question was planted) get that fact into the Times’ front-page story Thursday?

Seems like kind of a big thing to leave out…