Archive for August, 2004

Weekday Warriors II

DSC00742

I went out on Tuesday afternoon to find the protesters, who were supposed to be doing “direct action” around town. I found them, eventually, on The Post’s doorstep.

At this point, it seems like most of the people left in the streets of New York are the fanatics. But that’s not what bothers me.

What bothers me is this:

A crowd that has been screaming about free speech for the last three days — any time someone denied them a permit or asked them not to lie down in the middle of the street — showed up at my place of business, where people write news articles and broadcast their opinions, with a constructive message: “Shut up!”

Now, up to this point, I’ve been willing to give the protesters their due. Most of the people in the streets on Saturday and Sunday were decent people. But there is an element of this crowd that cannot tolerate dissent. It’s the element that was in front of my building screaming “shut up” and “Fox News off the air.”

Let me ask this: Do conservatives or libertarians protest leftist media organizations? Do I show up at The New York Times with a placard reading, “New York Times Unfair to Charter Schools!”? Maybe one or two nuts do this, but we were looking at a crowd of at least 1,000.

The entire idea of protesting a media organization strikes me as antithetical to the idea of a free press. I don’t mean that the protesters don’t have the right to do what they do. Nor do I mean that their protesting impinges on our right to free speech. But protesting a media organization, as opposed to, say, countering its arguments (or lack thereof), turns what could be a debate into a name-calling match.

And that, I fear, is all politics is to many of the people who were in the crowd today, anyway.

So, here are some of my pictures from Tuesday’s protest. It was, as always, a circus. There are some choice shots in here — chief among them, the one above.

Weekday Warriors I

DSC00663

Things were pretty mellow on the streets tonight. The police did what they could to prevent any large demonstrations.

But the question was front and center: How much security is too much security? Just how big does a security perimeter need to be? When does controlling protesters turn into violating their rights?

None of this is to say that the NYPD or anyone else has violated the protesters’ rights. Overall, the protests have been large and peaceful, and no one has had much to complain about. But while watching the police pushing people farther and farther away from Madison Square Garden, it was hard not to see the line between liberty and security being moved — physically as well as metaphysically — more and more to the side of security.

The more it’s pushed in that direction, however, the more it is likely to be pushed back — eventually.

You can see a gallery from Monday night here.

On the Other Hand…

Rudy may have gone a touch overboard in his endorsement of Bush when he said that the president “can see into the future.”

The Magnificent Rudy

Rudy Giuliani was absolutely magnificent Monday night. What amazed me most was his unabashed broadside not against John Kerry, but against Europe and European appeasement of terrorism.

Here is the stunning passage (transcript from CNN):

Terrorism did not start on September 11, 2001. It started a long time ago. And it had been festering for many years.

And the world had created a response to it that allowed it to succeed. The attack on the Israeli team at the Munich Olympics was in 1972. That’s a long time ago.

That’s not yesterday.

And the pattern began early. The three surviving terrorists were arrested. And then within just three months, the terrorists who slaughtered the Israeli athletes were released by the German government — set free.

AUDIENCE: Boooo.

GIULIANI: Action like this became the rule, not the exception. Terrorists came to learn time after time that they could attack, that they could slaughter innocent people and not face any consequences.

In 1985, terrorists attacked the Achille Lauro. And they murdered an American citizen who was in a wheelchair, Leon Klinghoffer. They marked him for murder solely because he was Jewish.

Some of those terrorists were released, and some of the remaining terrorists — they were allowed to escape by the Italian government because of fear of reprisals from the terrorists.

So terrorists learned they could intimidate the world community, and too often the response, particularly in Europe, would be accommodation, appeasement and compromise.

AUDIENCE: Boooo.

GIULIANI: And worse, they also learned that their cause would be taken more seriously almost in direct proportion to the horror of their attack.

Terrorist acts became like a ticket to the international bargaining table. How else to explain Yasser Arafat winning the Nobel Peace Prize while he was supporting a plague of terrorism in the Middle East and undermining any chance of peace?

Before September 11, we were living with an unrealistic view of our world, much like observing Europe appease Hitler or trying to accommodate the Soviet Union through the use of mutually assured destruction.

President Bush decided that we could no longer be just on defense against global terrorism, we must also be on offense.

Now, this wasn’t the most diplomatic passage. I’m sure the Germans and Italians are kicking their collective puppies this morning on the continent. But there hasn’t been a clearer exposition of how we got into the War on Terror from an American politician to date.

Giuliani has proven again and again that he has a deep understanding of the new world in which we are living. Listening to him tonight, I felt like no matter who wins in November, 2008 can’t come soon enough.

Kevin Smith…

lapses into self-parody.

Crouching Anarchist, Flaming Dragon

news08302004007

A lot of people have seen this picture (from the NY Post) of the papier-mâché dragon set on fire by protesters in pretty much the lone act of violence on Sunday.

Here are a couple of shots of it before it went up in flames:

DSC00529

DSC00530

DSC00531

The dragon banner seems to have had something to do with “self-determination.” Whatever the hell that is.

Radio Free NYC

Monday afternoon I went on the “Cam and Company” radio show on NRAnews.com (a wonderful work-around of the McCain-Feingold reforms). The host, Cam Edwards, and I talked about the protest scene.

As I did in my column Monday, I tried to reiterate the basic decency of those out on the streets this week in New York. A fringe element is present, and it may yet cause trouble. But the protesters cannot, on the whole, be dismissed as nuts.

Anyway, those who want can go to NRAnews.com and click on the left, where it says, “If you missed the last show click here,” to hear the segment. I come on in the last fifth of the show.

More Promises, Promises

Another batch of protest pics coming later tonight. First, I have to rehydrate after running around midtown in a suit all night.

Things are pretty mellow out there right now, but I feel like I just visited the physical nexus of the metaphysical liberty v. security debate.

The American Way of Protest

My latest column for The New York Post. On the weekend’s protests:

This weekend’s protests against the Republican National Convention were full of anger, radicalism, theatrics, crudeness, humor and comradery.

In other words, they looked a lot like America . . . or at least New York City.

There’s something profoundly satisfying about watching Upper-West-Side grandmothers, Baby-Boomer lawyers, washed-up hippies, anti-war libertarians, radical-queer anarchists, college kids from Illinois, anti-trade activists and suburban New Jersey families all in the same place.

Read the rest here.

M.O. WORLD EXCLUSIVE!!! MUST CREDIT M.O.!!!

DSC00459

Assassin poster outside Madison Square Garden, where President Bush is set to speak Thursday, causes concern.

Drudge, Wonkette miss story.

Developing…

Calculated Claims

It’s absolutely ludicrous how badly The New York Times wants to paint these protests as a replay of Chicago in 1968:

In a few dozen blocks of the same slender island, two worlds collided yesterday: the Republican convention’s calculated claims to patriotism and the presidency met elaborately planned and heavily Democratic street protests that turned those same arguments back at President Bush — in ways that might help, or hurt, both sides.

The demonstrations were New York City’s biggest in decades, and the most emphatic at any national political convention since Democrats and demonstrators turned against each other in fury over Vietnam in Chicago in 1968. But the first day was overwhelmingly peaceful, and the demonstrators doused a good bit of Mr. Bush’s intended message with television images of dissent.

Now, I’m not old enough to go spouting off about how things were back in 1968 — but please. “Most emphatic”???

The protesters are actually in a lose-lose situation. If they don’t cause trouble, then they don’t upstage the convention’s pre-packaged message.

But if they do cause trouble, then they reinforce the convention’s pre-packaged message: “We’re strong on defense, and we will protect you from bin Laden AND from hippies.”

For now, they’re playing their hand about as well as they can — making a show of numbers, but keeping it peaceful.

And what, by the way, are “calculated claims to patriotism”?

Weekend Warriors III

DSC00493

More than 100,000 people came out to protest Sunday, under the umbrella of United for Peace and Justice. We can be sure crowd estimates will, as usual, vary.

Regardless, the protesters are always colorful, if nothing else.

Here’s a set of pictures from Sunday’s march.

Or you can click on the gallery, “RNC Sunday,” to the right.

(NOTE: Clicking on the picture above makes it possible to read the fine print at the bottom. Worthwhile.)

Promises, Promises

I’ve been promising more photos, and more photos there shall be, from Sunday’s United for Peace and Justice march in Manhattan.

Weird, wild stuff.

I’ll post a new gallery on that later tonight. And then look for my column on the weekend’s protests in Monday’s New York Post.

Updated II

The RNC Saturday gallery is updated. With more than double the pictures.

Updated I

The March for Women’s Lives gallery is updated — now with double the pictures.

InstaReaders

Welcome InstaReaders and others seeking photo coverage of the conventions. Much more is on the way. Pull up a bookmark and stay a while.

Weekend Warriors II

DSC00461

More protest pics. And more of each of the first two sets to come later.

Click here for the rest of this gallery.

Weekend Warriors I

DSC00326

Well, the weekend of protests is upon us here in New York City. One of them, the March for Women’s Lives, started right at my doorstep in Brooklyn.

Here are a few pictures of it. (You can also click the gallery to the right.)

More pictures will be coming later (a lot more), from this protest and from the others I get to during the day. There will also be some further explanations of some of the shots.

No time to write now, though. Just hydrating and getting back out there.

Bush v. Kerry v. Nader v. Badnarik

duckforpresident

Screw it.

I’m voting Duck for President.

Hugo’s Hellscape

Will the current spam plague bring us to a post-apocalyptic hellscape in which machines rule the earth and use humans as batteries that become incredibly whiny and melodramatic right before their final confrontation with Hugo Weaving?

Maybe. (Via Technology Liberation Front)

Protest Coverage

Before and during the Republican National Convention, I will be all over the protest scene — like stink on a hippie.

I intend to photoblog it thoroughly, so you can expect lots of pictures starting late Saturday night, and then updated throughout the convention.

So, watch this space.

There might even be naked people!

Chartergate VI

The American Federation of Teachers has written in to The Wall Street Journal to respond to this piece (which pointed out that the same data the AFT used to claim that charter schools were falling behind traditional public schools also shows that religious schools are trouncing traditional public schools):

‘Cheerleaders’ Should Accept AFT’s Homework
August 26, 2004

The trio of charter-school cheerleaders who attacked the American Federation of Teachers for uncovering federal data unfavorable to charter schools tried but failed to undermine our findings (”Dog Eats AFT Homework,” William G. Howell, Paul E. Peterson and Martin R. West, Aug. 18).

Indeed, the authors acknowledged they were able to replicate our results for charter schools included in the 2003 National Assessment of Educational Progress. This comports with the comment of Darvin Winnick, the Bush administration-appointed chair of the board governing the federal test, that “there shouldn’t be any question about the results.” And even charter school enthusiast Chester Finn calls the charter school scores “low, dismayingly low.”

Forgotten in the frenzy to discredit the findings is that the AFT did not manufacture these data. They come directly from the 2003 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) results, well-hidden on a federal government Web site.

The authors protest that charter schools must contend with “challenging situations. . . and students.” Yet the evidence does not support the assertion that disadvantaged students in charter schools are more “challenged” than those in regular public schools. For starters, you’ll find comparatively few special-education students in charter schools.

AFT was an early supporter of the charter concept — allowing public schools greater autonomy to explore promising reforms and innovations, while maintaining high standards for achievement and accountability. While there are some effective charter schools, the charter-school movement as a whole unfortunately has taken a very different turn, embracing the freedoms of the idea but all too often flouting the accountability that should go with them.

The AFT does not accept the NAEP’s results only when they suit us. We have heeded (and even publicized) the NAEP’s warnings when it held disappointing news for public schools. If only the charter school crowd could be equally honest.

Edward J. McElroy
President
American Federation of Teachers
Washington

Now, there’s a ton to respond to here. I’ll try to pick out only the most glaring idiocies.

First up, no one ever said the AFT’s data were bad — just the way they interpreted the data (and The New York Times reported the data) was bad. As has been rehashed so many times before, they claimed there was a gap between public and charter schools, but that gap disappears when you take into account how many more black and Hispanic students charter schools educate.

Second, the AFT quotes Chester Finn (as quoted, in turn, by The New York Times). Let me quote him in The New York Post, a few days after the AFT study came out: “The war over charter schools is being waged on many fronts, so beware teachers unions bearing ‘gifts,’ especially in an election year.” This is not, I suspect, a man who feels he was quoted in context the first time around.

Third, the AFT says that special-education numbers indicate that charter-school students are not more challenged than other public-school students. It’s a nice bait-and-switch, moving the issue away from race and poverty. But even taking things on the ground McElroy’s chosen, there’s a pretty simple explanation: Since charter schools often don’t get extra money for special-ed students (as public schools do), they have less incentive to designate children as special-ed.

Fourth, we have the AFT’s “more in sadness than in anger” routine (phrase-tip, Eduwonk) about how they really wish charter schools were succeeding. Let’s just say they’re counting on the public’s ignorance there.

And, finally, fifth. The AFT says that it heeds the NAEP data on public schools just as much as it heeds the data it uncovered recently about charter schools. Well, to continue the trend of hanging the AFT by its own argument here: If one year of negative data has convinced the union that it’s time to shut down the entire charter school experiment, surely 20+ years of data on inner-city public schools has convinced it that it’s time to try something new there as well!

Vouchers, perhaps?

New York’s Good Ideas

My latest for The Post, on the power of good ideas in New York City:

IN 2001, a New York Times editor interviewed liberal columnist Anthony Lewis as he was retiring from the paper. One question: “Have you changed your views on socialism?” Lewis’ answer: “I’m still for it. But it doesn’t work.”

And that’s New York City in a nutshell.

Tony Coles, former deputy mayor to Rudolph Giuliani, put it a bit differently at yesterday’s Manhattan Institute symposium on “Compassionate Conservative Policies That Changed New York City.” Coles’ version: Never underestimate “the power of bad ideas.”

The Manhattan Institute symposium was quite enlightening and tied in nicely with the convention.

Sickening

Why would President Bush support cracking down on all 527 groups, when one of them, Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, is demolishing his opponent?

Well, he wouldn’t. At least not if it had any chance of effecting this election — his last, one way or the other.

While the vast majority of 527 money is spent on Kerry’s side of the field — as is made clear here — the money being spent on Bush’s side is having a far greater impact right now.

So, Bush can mouth platitudes about reform. And then, after the election — whoever wins — both parties can again conspire to shut out these terrible, “shadowy,” “outside” groups who attack all the poor little candidates.

Groups that used to be known collectively as: “the public.”

Absolutely sickening.

Jon-John II

And then there’s this:

JON STEWART:
We’re talking with Senator John Kerry. Let’s talk energy. Oil. Is — is oil gonna turn out to be America’s kryptonite? What — (LAUGHTER) you know, we — we have this substance. It’s clearly finite. It’s clearly in someone else’s country. What — what are we gonna — (LAUGHTER) are we gonna have to take over the whole damn region?

JOHN KERRY:
The — it’s the most extraordinary thing in the world. United States has three percent of the world’s oil reserves. We import 61 percent of our oil. There is no possible way for us to drill our way out this crisis. We have to invent our way out of it.

We have to invent our way out of it by moving to alternatives, to renewables, to fuel efficient vehicles. To biomass…

Now, I’ll give John Kerry this: Oil dependence is, to say the least, problematic.

But 3% of the world’s oil supply is nothing at which to sneeze. That 3% — more than 30 billion barrels — could fuel America’s economy for four years solid.

But, of course, we would never actually have to produce every drop of our own oil (nor could we without a lot more drilling and refining). Oil is traded on a global market. The worst Saudi Arabia and the rest of OPEC can do is make prices go up substantially. That’s no small thing, but it’s made a lot worse by, say, keeping the oil reserves in Alaska off the table and making it so that we have nothing to use to offset OPEC.

But, let’s just take the question of “invent[ing] our way out of it.”

Politicians love to propose to invent things. There’s nothing they love more — save raising taxes on cigarettes.

We’re going to cure cancer, AIDS, diabetes, Alzheimer’s, social-anxiety disorder and the heebeegeebies just by giving waving the federal government’s magic wand — or so politicians tell us in every campaign and/or State of the Union Address.

Well, sorry, but no. Same with the electric car and fuel cells.

Progress is only going to occur in proportion to the extent that high oil prices create a demand for alternative fuels. Earlier this year, reports started to come in that hybrid gas-electric cars were seeing a modest boost in sales because of higher gas prices (see here and here).

Kerry’s response, of course, was not to let the market take its course and to let people feel the effects of oil dependence so that they might modify their behavior — as they will, when the time is right, in a free market.

No, Kerry’s response was to propose that President Bush crack open the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to artificially lower prices.

Like a good little planner, Kerry wants to subsidize low oil prices now (promoting energy dependence) and give away money at the same time (to promote energy independence).

There really is no underestimating the power of bad ideas.

[P.S. For perspective: Milk still costs a dollar more per gallon than gas, on average.]

Jon-John I

Just to add one more note (and then another) on the John Kerry Daily Show appearance, for now, Wonkette went to the trouble of posting a full transcript.

Here’s one of my favorite parts:

JON STEWART:
Do you think you’ll — when — when you get into the debates with him is this going to be — will you be able to do that? Or — or will he — I’ve seen he’s very shrewd in debates of saying, “Look, this is a choice. It’s a — it’s a very easy choice between — a man who loves — Fidel Castro and — (LAUGHTER) and someone who — loves America.” You know? How — how do you — do you think you will ever be able to have an honest discussion?

JOHN KERRY:
Well, that’s the test of debates. I mean, look, the President has won every debate he’s ever had. People need to understand that. He beat Ann Richards. He beat Al Gore. So he’s a good debater.

Sen. Kerry, just how are you going to beat that lying, scumbag president of ours?

A Front That Liberates Technology

These guys are immense nerds:

I’ve been spending some time lately thinking about digital rights management…

But they’re worth a visit if you care about… [puts pinky up to mouth like Dr. Evil] THE FUTURE!

They’re the Technology Liberation Front.

A Fair Question

fear_factor

Via my mother.

DYO Consumer Products

This article from Slate delves into the topic of what the author, Clive Thompson, calls “grass-roots industrial design,” meaning consumers designing their own household products — like computers, cars, stamps, coffee mugs and the like.

In no small part he is — admittedly — piggybacking off of Virginia Postrel’s excellent book, The Substance of Style.

He writes:

Today, rapid-prototyping technology — that is, 3-D printers that can instantly crank out a physical copy of anything you design on a computer — is available only to elite design firms. It’ll get cheaper within years. Meanwhile, “original design manufacturing” companies overseas are becoming expert at quickly and cheaply cranking out MP3 players and laptops to specs set by brand-name firms like Virgin or Sony. Put those trends together, and it’s easy to envision an offshore service that will take my personal design for a music player and crank out 10 copies. Presto: the Clive brand MP3 player! Think of it as vanity electronics — casemodding on a superfast, global scale.

Yet more proof that our rapidly developing and expanding consumer culture is not a homogenizing force, but quite the opposite.

Even if not everyone wants to design their own products from an aesthetic point of view — which plenty of people won’t want to do — you can already order things like computers and cars with a remarkable degree of customization. With computers, on a dell.com or apple.com, and I’m sure plenty of other places, you can simply click ‘yes’ or ‘no’ on scores of features to create a product tailored exactly to your requirements — and then have it delivered to your door.

It’s easy to forget the revolutionary technologies that became commonplace just in the last few years. And someday we’ll take self-designed MP3-player/ATM-card/cell-phone/self-defense-tasers for granted, too.

Simple Separation

Hillel Halkin, an Israeli liberal and defender of the security fence, finally takes a tour of the controversial barrier and writes about it for The New York Sun:

The [IDF] colonel claimed — and was able to back himself up with facts, figures, and anecdotes — that, although the Palestinians on its other side are often unhappy with the fence, they are the first to concede that it has in some ways improved their lives.

Now that terror attacks and suicide bombings — let alone ordinary crime like car theft and burglary — coming from Kalkilya into Israel have been reduced by the fence to practically zero, thus occasioning a parallel reduction of Israeli military incursions and curfews, life on the Palestinian side is more peaceful and economically prosperous than it has been for years.

The armed Intifada in the Kalkilya district is, at least for the moment, all but dead, in no small measure due to the fence, which has resulted in the saving not only of many Israeli lives but also of many Palestinian lives.

By imposing for the first time since 1967 a basic separation between Jews and Palestinians, it has taken a large step toward freeing them of each other. It is unfortunate that the world, which has been calling for such a separation for years, refuses to recognize its advantages now that it is happening.

Why simple separation is such an abomination to the Europeans is beyond me. Or maybe it’s not. But I’d prefer to think that it is.




 

Ryan Sager's Email List

Name:
Email:
Subscribe  Unsubscribe